Keeping out others – the Modern System of Anti-Access/Area Denial Weapons
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35926/HDR.2021.1-2.2Kulcsszavak:
anti-access/area-denial, A2/AD, missiles, operational conceptAbsztrakt
Anti-access/area-denial systems and operational concepts or strategies are the products of the technological evolution of weapons. However, some of them already existed before, and the advent of modern, long range and sophisticated missiles became real game changers. With these weapons put in a well-planned system, a credible deterrence and defence potential can be provided, or the restriction of the use of domains like air, sea, or land of other countries. This article presents these weapons and the most developed of such systems.
Hivatkozások
• “AEGIS Fail in Black SEA, Ruskies Burn down USS Donald ‘Duck’”. 13 November 2014. http://www.veteranstoday.com/2014/11/13/aegis-fail-in-black-sea-ruskies-burn-down-uss-donald-duck/, Accessed on 7 January 2017.
• Air-Sea Battle: Service Collaboration to Address Anti-Access & Area Denial Challenges. Air-Sea Battle Office, 2013. https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/csf/1/
• Annual report to Congress: Military and Security Developments Involving the People’s Republic of China. Washington D. C.: Department of Defense, 2016.
• Binnie, J. “Iranian S-300 deliveries completed”. http://www.janes.com/article/64615/iranian-s-300-deliveries-completed, Accessed on 7 January 2017.
• Borger, J. “Wake-up call”. The Guardian, 6 September 2002. http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2002/sep/06/usa.iraq, Accessed on 7 January 2017.
• Clark, B. Commanding the seas: A plan to reinvigorate U.S. Navy surface warfare. Washington: Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments, 2014.
• Cordesman, A. H. and Seitz, A. C. “Gulf Threats, Risks and Vulnerabilities: Terrorism and Asymmetric Warfare”. Center for Strategic and International Studies, Washington D.C. 27 August 2009. https://csis-website-prod.s3.amazonaws.com/s3fs-public/legacy_files/files/publication/090827_gulf_terror_assym.pdf, Accessed on 7 Janu-ary 2017.
• De Larrinaga, N. “Russian submarine activity topping Cold War levels”. Jane’s Defence Weekly, 10 February 2016. http://www.janes.com/article/57650/russian-submarine-activity-topping-coldwar-levels, Accessed on 7 January 2017.
• Fisher, R. D. Jr. “China proposes ‘Underwater Great Wall’ That Could Erode US, Russian Sub-marine Advantages”. Jane’s Defence Weekly, 25 May 2016. http://www.janes.com/article/60388/china-proposes-underwater-great-wall-that-could-erode-us-russian-submarine-advantages, Accessed on 7 January 2017.
• Fisher, R. D. Jr. “Imagery suggests China has deployed YJ-62 ASCMs to Woody Island”. Jane’s Defence Weekly, 30 March 2016. http://www.janes.com/article/59003/imagery-suggests-china-hasdeployed-yj-62-anti-ship-missiles-to-woody-island, Accessed on 7 January 2017.
• Foss, Ch. F. and O’Halloran, J. C. (eds.) IHS Jane’s Land Warfare Platforms: Artillery & Air Defence 2012–2013. Coulsdon: IHS Jane’s, IHS Global Ltd., 2012.
• Freedberg, S. J. Jr. “Red Electrons: Army Rapid Capabilities Office Fights Russian GPS Jamming, Cyber, EW”. Break-ing Defense. 22 November 2016. http://breakingdefence.com/2016/11/red-electrons-army-rapid-capabilities-office-fights-russian-gps-jamming-cyber-ew/, Accessed on 7 January 2017.
• Galeotti, M. „Red Alert: Russian military underpins foreign policy”. Jane’s Intelligence Review 28/7. 2016. 8–15.
• Gunzinger, M. and Dougherty, Ch. Outside-In: Operating from Range to Defeat Iran’s Anti-Access and Area-Denial Threats. Washington: Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments; 2011.
• Haghshenass, F. Iran’s Asymmetric Naval Warfare. Washington: Washington Institute for Near East Policy, 2008.
• Hilburn, M. “Asymmetric Strategy: Growing Iranian Navy relies on ’unbalanced warfare’ tactics”. Sea Power 49/12. 2006. 14–17.
• Himes, J. “Iran’s Two Navies: a maturing maritime strategy”. Institute for the Study of War. 2011. www.jstor.org/stable/resrep07900, Accessed on 7 January 2017.
• Iran Military Power: ensuring regime survival and securing regional dominance. Washington D.C.: Defence Intelli-gence Agency, 2019.
• Iran’s Naval Forces. Suitland: The Office of Naval Intelligence, 2009.
• Kopp, C. “Soviet/Russian Cruise Missiles: technical report APA-TR-2009-0805”. http://www.ausairpower.net/APA-Rus-Cruise-Missiles.html, Accessed on 9 January 2017.
• Lokshin, J. “Russia’s Anti-Access Area Denial”. July 2016. https://missiledefenceadvocacy.org/missile-threat-and-proliferation/todays-missile-threat/russia/russia-anti-access-area-denial/, Accessed on 11 February 2020.
• Majumdar, D. “U.S. Navy Impressed with New Russian Attack Boat”. 28 October 2014. https://news.usni.org/2014/10/28/u-s-navy-impressed-new-russian-attack-boat, Accessed on 9 January 2017.
• Martin, L. NATO and the Defense of the West. New York: Holt and Winston, 1985.
• Martinage, R. Toward a new strategy offset: Exploiting U.S. long-term advantages to restore U.S. global power pro-jection capability. Washington D. C.: Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments, 2014.
• Annual report to Congress: Military and Security Developments Involving the People’s Republic of China. Washington D. C.: Department of Defence, 2016.
• Miller, D. and Miller, Ch. Modern Naval Warfare. New York: Crescent Books, 1986.
• Mladenov, A. “Access denied: Fortifying Putin’s Skies”. Air Forces Monthly 334/1. 2016.
• Naval Operations Concept 2010: implementing the maritime strategy. Washington D. C.: Department of Navy, 2010.
• Novichkov, N. and Felstead, P. “Russian Project 971 submarines to be armed with Kalibr missiles”. Jane’s Defence Weekly, 24 March 2016. http://www.janes.com/article/59030/russian-project-971-submarines-to-be-armed-with-kalibr-missiles, Accessed on 14 December 2016.
• O’Rourke, R. China Naval Modernization: Implications for U.S. Navy Capabilities: Background and Issues for Cong-ress. Washington: Congressional Research Service, 2016.
• “Project 677 Lada Class / Project 1650 Amur Class Submarines”. http://www.naval-technology.com/projects/project-677-lada-class-project-1650-amur-class-submarines/, Accessed on 9 January 2017.
• Ripley, T. “Gulf of distrust: Naval stand-offs and the Persian Gulf”. Jane’s Intelligence Review 20/3. 2008. 8–15.
• Russel, R. L. “Future Gulf War: Arab and American Forces against Iranian Capabilities”. Joint Force Quarterly 55/4. 2009. 35–40.
• Ryall, J., Dominguez, G. and Gibson, N. “Russia deploys Bal and Bastion-P missile systems to disputed Kuril Islands, says report”. Jane 360, 23 November 2016. http://www.janes.com/article/ 65714/russia-deploys-bal-and-bastion-p-missile-systems-to-disputed-kuril-islands-says-report,Accessed on 7 January 2017
• Sukhankin, S „David vs Goliath: Kaliningrad Oblast as Russia’s A2/AD ‘Bubble’” Scandinavian Journal of Military Studies 2/1. 2019. 95–110. DOI: http://doi.org/10.31374/sjms.20
• The Military Balance 2015 London: The International Institute for Strategic Studies, 2015
• The Military Balance 2019 London: The International Institute for Strategic Studies, 2019
• The PLA Navy. Suitland: Offi ce of Naval Intelligence, 2015.
• The Russian Navy. Suitland: Offi ce of Naval Intelligence, 2015.
• “U 32 gegen US-Flugzeugträgerverband”. Europäische Sicherheit & Technik 61/3 2013
• Varfolomeeva, A „Signalling strength: Russia’s real Syria success is electronic warfare against the US” https://thedefencepost com/2018/05/01/russia-syria-electronic-warfare/, Accessed on 11 February 2020
• Ward, S R Immortal: A military history of Iran and its armed forces Washington D C : Georgetown University Press, 2009
