The Comprehensive Approach of Military Strategic Operations Planning and its support by Artificial Intelligence

Szerzők

  • Gulyás György alezredes
  • Szajkó Gyula őrnagy

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35926/HDR.2023.1-2.2

Kulcsszavak:

logistic support, Contractor Support to Operations, commercial contracted capability, interests of the military and contractors, competition

Absztrakt

It is a basic requirement of successful multinational operations that the necessary resources should be at NATO’s or nations’ disposal in the required time, quantity, and quality. For this, the Contractor Support to Operations (CSO), which is one important pillar of the operations logistics support, assumes more and more roles. The contractors’ basic task is to supplement the capability- or capacity gaps showing up in the military or in the Host Nation Support. Besides this, CSO frees up military capacities and, at the same time, the military can achieve new and necessary expertise. However, the consideration to use contractors requires a thorough discretion from the early stage of the operation planning process. This should cover not only the capabilities of the potential civilian companies and the military requirements, but military planners should also take into account the interests of the enterprises that may provide support to the operations. As the demand for civilian services grows, so does the competition between national defence forces for the most suitable suppliers with the best capabilities and capacities. The authors’ aim is to draw attention to the importance of understanding the conractors’ interests and limitations, as well as to give some suggestions on harmonizing the military and civilian service providers’ goals to the benefits of both parties.

Szerző életrajzok

Gulyás György alezredes

University lecturer at the University of Public Service in Budapest, Hungary

Szajkó Gyula őrnagy

University assistant professor at the University of Public Service in Budapest, Hungary

Hivatkozások

• AJP-3.4 Allied Joint Doctrine for Non-Article 5, Crisis Response Operations, NATO Standardization Agency 2010.

• Ált/217 – Hungarian Defence Froces Joint Force Logistics Doctrine, 3rd edition. (in Hungarian) (Budapest: Hungarian Defence Forces, 2015) 198.

• Balla, T. “Civilian and military assets in light of contracted logistical services.” (in Hungarian). Katonai Logisztika, 10/3. 2003. 51.

• “Contractor Support to Operations (CSO) & Contractors on Deployed Operations (CONDO) – Providing enduring in‐theatre technical support to front line operations”. Persides. 29 May 2014. https://www.militarysystems-tech.com/sites/militarysystems/files/supplier_docs//CONDO.pdf

• EU Concept for Contractor Support to EU-led military operations. (Brussels: Council of the European Union, 2014) 9.

• Fortner, J. A. “Institutionalizing Contractor Support on the Battlefield”. Army Logistician, 32/4. 2000. 13.

• NATO Logistic Handbook. NATO Standardization Agency, 2012. 27.

• Szajkó, Gy. and Fábos, R. “Ideas on possibilities of development in military logistic chain.” (in Hungarian) Katonai Logisztika, 28/1–2. 2020. 169.

• Taksás, B. “The Trinity of defense industry”. Economics and Management, 8/1. 2019. 71.

• Williams, D. K. and Latham Jr., W. C. “Sustainers should understand operational contract support”. Army Sustainment, May-June 2016. Focus. 4.

##submission.downloads##

Megjelent

2023-11-28

Hogyan kell idézni

Gulyás , G., & Szajkó , G. (2023). The Comprehensive Approach of Military Strategic Operations Planning and its support by Artificial Intelligence. Honvédségi Szemle – Hungarian Defence Review, 151(1-2), 21–33. https://doi.org/10.35926/HDR.2023.1-2.2

Folyóirat szám

Rovat

Military Science in Theory and Practice