Of Ends and Means: The Integration of Psychological Operations and Cyber Operations
Kulcsszavak:Psychological operations, cyber operations, information operations, terminology
Terminology is a general word for the group of specialized meanings relating to a particular field, encapsulating its meaning and intent. This article focuses on the evolving military terminology regarding psychological operations as technology moves forward. As a non-kinetic type of operation its content is more shifting, thus different terminologies are used, creating ambiguity. Furthermore, different concepts are behind as to what constitutes psychological operations. Words are important in naming the narrative and in this article, I will present a brief overview of this evolution and how it reflects on the present thinking – and it is a reflection of the organization of military forces.
“1163/2020. (IV.21.) Korm. határozat Magyarország Nemzeti Biztonsági Stratégiájáról”. [Government Decree No. 1163/2020. on Hungary’s National Security Strategy] Magyar Közlöny 81. 2020. 2101–2118.
Ajir, M. and Vailliant, B. “Russian Information Warfare: Implications for Deterrence Policy”. Strategic Studies Quarterly 12/3. 2018. 70–89.
Ált/46: Lélektani műveletek doktrína. Budapest: Magyar Honvédség, 2014.
Ált/57: Információs műveletek doktrína. Budapest: Magyar Honvédség, 2014.
Connell, M. and Vogler, S. Russia’s approach to cyber warfare. Arlington, VA: Center for Naval Analysis “The Cyber Domain”. The Cyber Defense Review 2/3. 2017. 63–78.
Daugherty, W. E. “Origin of Psyop Terminology”. In Mclaurin, R. D. (ed.) Military Propaganda: Psychological Warfare and Operations. New York: Praeger Publishers, 1987. 255–271.
Ferrara, E., Varol, O., Davis, C., Menczer, F. and Flammini, A. “The Rise of Social Bots”. Communications of the ACM 59/7. 2016. 96–104. DOI: 10.1145/2818717
Georgieva, V. “Systematization of military terminology: mission (im)possible?”. In Foreign Language Competence as an Integral Component of a University Graduate Profile. Brno: University of Defence, 2007. 85–104.
Giles, K. Handbook of Russian Information Warfare. Rome: NATO Defense College, 2016.
Haig, Zs., and Várhegyi, I. “A cybertér és a cyberhadviselés értelmezése”. Hadtudomány 18/e. 2008. 1–12. http://mhtt.eu/hadtudomany/2008/2008_elektronikus/2008_e_2.pdf
“Joint publication 3-12: cyberspace operations”. US Joint Chiefs of Staff. 8 June 2018. https://www.hsdl.org/?view&did=812851, Accessed on 7 May 2020.
“Joint publication 3-13: information operations”. US Joint Chiefs of Staff. 13 February 2006. https://www.hsdl.org/?view&did=461648, Accessed on 7 May 2020.
“Joint publication 3-13: joint doctrine for information operations”. US Joint Chiefs of Staff. 9 October 1998. https://www.hsdl.org/?view&did=3759, Accessed on 7 May 2020.
“Joint publication 3-13: information operations”. US Joint Chiefs of Staff. 20 November 2014. https://www.hsdl.org/?view&did=759867
Jones, F. L. “Information: the psychological instrument”. In Bartholomees, J. B. (ed.), U.S. Army War College guide to national security policy and strategy. Carlisle: Strategic Studies Institute, US Army War College, 2014. 198-210.
Kupreev, O., Badovskaya, E. and Gutnikov, A. “DDoS attacks in Q1 2020”. Kasperski Securelist. 6 May 2020. https://securelist.com/ddos-attacks-in-q1-2020/96837/, Accessed on 10 June 2020.
Larson, E. V., Darilek, R. E., Gibran, D., Nichiporuk, B., Richardson, A., Schwartz, L. H. and Thurston, C. Q. Foundations of Effective Influence Operations: a Framework for Enhancing Army Capabilities. Santa Monica: RAND Corporation, 2009.
Libicki, M. C. “The Convergence of Information Warfare”. Strategic Studies Quarterly 11/1. 2017. 49–65.
Myers, M. “The Army’s psychological operations community is getting its name back”. Army Times, 6 November 2017. https://www.armytimes.com/news/your-army/2017/11/06/the-armys-psychological-operations-community-is-getting-its-name-back/, Accessed on 30 November 2020.
Nakasone, P. M. “A cyber force for persistent operations”. Joint Force Quarterly 92/1. 2019. 10-14.
“NATO Standard AJP-3: Allied Joint Doctrine for the conduct of operations”. NATO Standardization Office. February 2019. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/797323/doctrine_nato_conduct_of_ops_ajp_3.pdf
Porsche III, I. R., Paul, C., York, M. , Serena, C. C., Sollinger, J. M., Axelband, E., Min, E. Y. and Held, B. J. Redefining information warfare boundaries for an army in a wireless world. Santa Monica: RAND Corporation, 2013.
Post, J. M. “The key role of psychological operations in countering terrorism”. In Forrest, J. J. F. (ed.) Countering Terrorism and Insurgency in the 21st Century: Strategic and Tactical Considerations.
Westport: Praeger Security International, 2007. 380–392.
„Psychological warfare”. Encyclopedia Brittania. https://www.britannica.com/topic/psychological-warfare, Accessed on 10 June 2020.
Schneier, B. “8 ways to stay ahead of influence operations”. Foreign Policy, 12 August 2019. https://foreignpolicy.com/2019/08/12/8-ways-to-stay-ahead-of-influence-operations/, Accessed on 15 May 2020.
Smith, C. H. “Psychological Warfare”. Naval War College Review 6/2. 1953. 39–61.
Theohary, C. A. “Defense Primer: Information Operations”. Congressional Research Service. 14 January 2020. https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/IF/IF10771, Accessed on 8 May 2020.
van Mil, J. W. F. and Henman, M. “Terminology, the importance of defining”. International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy 38/3. 709-713. DOI: 10.1007/s11096-016-0294-5.
Weitz, R. “Assessing the Russian Disinformation Campaign During COVID-19”. International Centre for Defence and Security. 13 November 2020. https://icds.ee/en/assessing-the-russian-disinformationcampaign-during-covid-19/, Accessed on 20 December 2020.
Tashev, B., Purcell, M. and McLaughlin, B. “Russia’s Information Warfare, Exploring the Cognitive Dimension”. Marine Corps University Journal 10/2. 2019. 129-147. DOI: 10.21140/mcuj.2019100208.