Enhancing Challenge Framing in Defence Organisations: Towards Reflexive Methods .

Szerzők

  • Philippe Beaulieu-Brossard, PhD
  • Philippe Dufort

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35926/HDR.2020.2.2

Kulcsszavak:

challenge framing, challenge formulation, problematization, problem solving, problem statement, problem structuring, design theory, design methods, critical theory, system theory, planning, philosophy of knowledge, critical thinking, creative thinking

Absztrakt

This article contributes to problem solving, design, and planning in defence organisations by arguing that a ‘problem’ or a ‘challenge’ is never objective, natural or ready-made. Challenges are contingent to the conditions under which individuals perceive and formulate them. As a result, this article understands ‘challenges’ and ‘approaches’ to address them as co-dependent on one another. This article recommends that officers should attempt to generate the most interesting and, we hope, innovative problem-solution pair or challenge-approach pair in order to integrate this insight into practice when problem solving, designing, or planning. Leaders and their teams can learn to inhabit this mind-set by finding inspiration in three modes observed through practice: initial challenge framing, challenge curation and co-evolution. For each of these modes, the article proposes reflexive methods and tools for enhancing introspection in challenge framing and formulation namely the Five Whys, question-storming, and loyal opposition. The article supports these recommendations and methods through insights gleaned from philosophy of knowledge, design theory, and on design experiences with the North American Aerospace Defence Command (NORAD) in 2019.

Szerző életrajzok

Philippe Beaulieu-Brossard, PhD

Marie S. Curie Fellow at the Centre for Military Studies, University of Copenhagen and an assistant professor (on leave) specializing in Defence, Security Studies, and Design Theory at the Canadian Forces College (CFC)

Philippe Dufort

Associate professor at the School of Social Innovation at Saint Paul University, Ottawa

Hivatkozások

Ackoff, R. The Art of Problem Solving. New York: Wiley, 1987.

Bason, C., Leading Public Sector Innovation: Co-Creating for a Better Society. 2nd ed. Bristol: Policy Press, 2018.

Beaulieu-Brossard, P. and Mitchell, P. “Challenge-Driven: Canadian Forces College’s Agnostic Approach to Design Thinking Education”. The Archipelago of Design: Reflexive Military Practices. 13 January 2019. http://militaryepistemology.com/challenge-driven/, Accessed on 3 January 2021.

Beaulieu-Brossard, P. and Dufort, P. “Introduction: Reflexive Military Practitioners.” Journal of Military and Strategic Studies 17/4. 2017. 1–20.

Burger, K. ‘Understanding Participant Engagement in Problem Structuring Interventions with Self-Determination Theory.’ Journal of the Operational Research Society 2020. DOI: 10.1080/01605682.2020.1790307, Accessed on January 23 2020.

Dorst, K. Notes on Design: How Creative Practice Works. Amsterdam: BIS Publisher, 2018.

Dorst, K. and Cross, N. “Creativity in the Design Process: Co-Evolution of the Problem-Solution.” Design Studies 22/5. 2001. 425–437.

Dufort, P. “What is Strategic Design?” TedX Budapest. March 2020. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s5LWJ2WEukI, Accessed on 20 January 2021.

“Experiment module: the Blind Spot”. McGill University. https://thebrain.mcgill.ca/flash/capsules/experience_jaune06.html, Accessed on 8 March 2021.

Finnegan, G. “How we Perceive Colour Depends on Our Culture and Language – Prof. Anna Franklin”.

Horizon, 15 November 2016. https://horizon-magazine.eu/article/how-we-perceive-colourdepends-our-culture-and-language-prof-anna-franklin.html, Accessed on 5 June 2020.

Foucault, M. Fearless Speech. Los Angeles: Semiotext(e), 2001.

Foucault, M. “Polemics, Politics and Problematizations: an interview with Michael Foucault”. In Foucault, M., Rabinow, P. (ed.), Ethics: Subjectivity and Truth. New York: New Press, 1997. 111–119.

Giddens, A. Politics of Climate Change. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2011.

Graicer, O. “Self disruption: Seizing the High Ground of Systemic Operational Design (SOD).” Special Issue: Reflexive Military Practitioners: Design Thinking and Beyond. Journal of Military and Strategic Studies 17/4. 2017. 21–37.

Gregersen, H. “Better Brainstorming: Focus on Questions, not Answers, for Breakthrough Insights”. Harvard Business Review 96/2. 2018. 64–71.

Gregersen, H. Questions are the Answer. New York: Harper Business, 2018.

Hall, M. and McChrystal, S. “International Security Assistance Force Commander’s Counterinsurgency Guidance”. ISAF Headquarters. 2009. https://www.nato.int/isaf/docu/official_texts/counterinsurgency_guidance.pdf, Accessed on 11 January 2021.

Inayatullah, N., Autobiographical International Relations. New York: Routledge. 2011.

Mills, C. W., The Sociological Imagination. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1959.

Orwell, G., Animal Farm: A Fairy Story. London: Secker and Warburg, 1945.

O’Shaughnessy, T. “NORAD and USNORTHCOM Commander’s Perspective: Rethinking How We Think About Homeland Defence”. 2019.

O’Shaughnessy, T., Strohmeyer, M. and Forrest, C. “Strategic Shaping: Expanding the Competitive Space”. Joint Force Quarterly 90/3. 2018. 10–15.

Pettit, S.L. and Toczek, D. M. “Like Hugging Grandma: Introducing Design into a Military Organisation”, “Special Issue: Reflexive Military Practitioners: Design Thinking and Beyond”. Journal of Military and Strategic Studies 17/4. 2017. 166–173.

Rittel, H. “The Reasoning of Designers”. In Protzen, J-P. and Harris, D. J., The Universe of Design: Horst Rittel’s Theories of Design and Planning. London: Taylor & Francis, 2010. 187–198.

Rittel, H. and Webber, M. “Dilemmas in a General Theory of Planning”. Policy Sciences 4/2. 1973. 155–169.

Robson, D. “Are There Really 50 Eskimo Words for Snow?”. The New Scientist, 18 December 2012. https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg21628962-800-are-there-really-50-eskimo-words-forsnow/, Accessed on 12 October 2020.

Schon, D. and Rein, M. Frame Reflection: Toward the Resolution of Intractable Policy Controversies. New York: Basic Books, 1995.

Serrat, O. “The Five Whys Technique”. In Serrat, O., Knowledge Solutions: Tools, Methods, and Approaches to Drive Organizational Performance. Singapore: Springer, 2017. 307-310. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-10-0983-9_32.

Spurlin, D. “The Problem Statement: What’s the Problem?”. Small Wars Journal, 6 August 2017. https://smallwarsjournal.com/jrnl/art/the-problem-statement-%E2%80%93-what%E2%80%99sthe-problem, Accessed on 18 January 2021.

Webb, P. T. “Policy Problematization”. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education 27/3. 2014. 364–376.

Weick, K. E. “Designing for Thrownness.” In Boland, R. J. jr. and Collopy, F., Managing as Designing. Stanford: Stanford Business Books, 2004. 74–78.

Wittgenstein, L. Philosophical Investigations. Sussex: Blackwell, 2009.

Wróbel, A. E., Cash, P. and Lomberg, C. “Pro-active Neutrality: The Key to Understanding Creative Facilitation”. Creativity and Innovation Management 29/3. 2020. 424–437. DOI: 10.1111/caim.12372.

Zweibelson, B. “The Military Design Movement: Postmodern comedians of war”. PhD Thesis. Lancaster: Lancaster University, 2021. DOI: 10.17635/lancaster/thesis/1176.

##submission.downloads##

Megjelent

2021-08-12

Hogyan kell idézni

Beaulieu-Brossard, P. ., & Dufort, P. . (2021). Enhancing Challenge Framing in Defence Organisations: Towards Reflexive Methods . Honvédségi Szemle – Hungarian Defence Review, 148(2), 33–49. https://doi.org/10.35926/HDR.2020.2.2

Folyóirat szám

Rovat

Innovation Methodologies For Defence Challenges