The Strategic Path of Russia in Eurasia

Szerzők

  • M. Ali Samay

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35926/HDR.2023.1-2.9

Kulcsszavak:

Russia, Soviet Union, Eurasianism, bipolar world order, multilateralism, global partnership

Absztrakt

The transformation of the bipolar world order into unilateral or American globalization began following the collapse of the Soviet Union. Ever since, the regions, countries, and markets of the world have been bizarrely interconnected with American economy and politics. Within this model, the US has become the centre of the world security, political and economic affairs. The re-emergence of Russia in the early 21th century raised the geopolitical and geo-economic importance of the entire Eurasian continent. China, India, Turkey, and Iran have coordinated some of their interests with Russia. These Eurasian powers are likely to create a common or shared geopolitical and geo-economic dominance in the region. This paper posits the hypothesis that Russian Eurasianist foreign policy strategy implies a comprehensive regional security, including political and economic cooperation initiatives by applying global partnership theory instead of heartland and rimland theory. It seeks an answer to the question of how Russia can shape a multi-vector diplomacy to convince the Eurasian great, middle and small powers to cooperate and coordinate their policies.

Információk a szerzőről

M. Ali Samay

PhD candidate at the Corvinus University of Budapest, Institute of World Economy.

Hivatkozások

• “Foreign Policy Concept of the Russian Federation.” The MoFA of the Russian Federation. Web. 1 December 2016.

• Bassin, M. “Eurasianism ‘Classical’ and ‘Neo’: the lines of continuity.” Cesran International. https://cesran.org/eurasianism-classical-and-neo-the-lines-of-continuity.html

• Bernier, P. Yevgeny Primakov’s Operational Code and Russian Foreign Policy. (Tampere: University of Tampere, 2018) 47.

• Brion, M. I am the World Occupier Timur. (Tehran: Mostufi Publication, 1984) 180.

• Chernenko, E. and Gabaev, A. “What Russia Thinks About Multilateralism.” Carnegie Endowment for Peace, 2019.

• Diez, T., Bode, I. & Da Costa, A. F. Key concepts in international relations. (Thousand Oaks: Sage Publishing, 2011) 187–191.

• Frolov, V. “Russia’s New Foreign Policy – A Show of Force and Power Projection.” The Moscow Times, 6 December 2016. https://www.themoscowtimes.com/2016/12/06/russias-new-foreignpolicy-based-on-force-and-power-projection-a56431

• Gerasimov, V. “The Value of Science Is in the Foresight.” (in Russian). Voenno-Promishlenni Kurier. 27 February 2013.

• Hubbard, G. and Kane, T. Balance: The economics of great powers from ancient Rome to modern America. Edited by First. (New York: Simon and Schuster, 2014) 16–34.

• Ikenberry, G. J. After Victory: Institutions, Strategic Restraint, and the Rebuilding of Order after Major Wars. New Edition. (Woodstock: Princeton University Press, 2019)

• Kaplan, R. D. The Return of Marco Polo’s World: War, Strategy, and American Interests in the Twenty-first Century. (London: Random House Trade Paperbacks, 2019) 46.

• Kuchins, A. C. “What is Eurasia to US (the US)?” Journal of Eurasian studies. Volume 9 (2). 2018.

• Mackinder J. H. “The Geographical Pivot of History.” The Geographical Journal, Volume 23. Mo.4. 1904.

• Miller, E. A. To Balance or to Not Balance. (Burlington: Ashgate Publishing Company, 2006) 12.

• Molchanov, M. A. Eurasian Regionalisms and Russian Foreign Policy. (Farnham: Ashgate Publishing, 2015) 72–79.

• Morgenthau, H. J.: Politics Among Nations: The Struggle For Power and Peace. Seventh edition ed. (New York: McGraw-Hill/Irwin, 1978) 83.

• Carter, P. M. Jr. “Understanding Russia’s Interest in Conflict Zones.” Washington DC.: United States Institute of Peace. 469. 2020.

• Peskov, D., 2019. “Like in the Wild West, US tells Europe to buy American natural gas at gunpoint – Kremlin Spokesman.” Russia Today-Web. 3 June 2019. https://www.rt.com/shows/sophieco/460929-peskov-kremlin-spokesman-interview/. Accessed on 5 June 2019.

• Peter, R. “Paradigms for Russian Policy in the Caspian Region.” Energy and Conflict in Central Asia and the Caucasus, Volume 163. 2000.

• Rumer, E. “The Primakov (Not Gerasimov) Doctrine in Action.” Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 5 June 2019.

• Sengupta, A., Chatterjee, S. & Bhattacharya, S. (Eds.). Asiatic Russia: Partnerships and Communities in Eurasia. (New Delhi: Shipra, 2009) 24.

• Simha, R. K. “Primakov: The man who created multipolarity.” Modern Diplomacy, 30 June 2015. https://moderndiplomacy.eu/2015/06/30/primakov-the-man-who-created-multipolarity/

• Stroev, E. S., Bliakhman, L. S. and Krotov, M. I. Russia and Eurasia at the Crossroads: Experience and Problems of Economic Reforms in the Commonwealth of Independent States. Berlin: Springer-Verlag. 1999. 5–37.

• Sun Tzu. The art of war. In: Strategic Studies. Second ed. (Abingdon: Routledge, 2014) 86–110.

• Trenin, D. “From greater Europe to greater Asia. The Sino-Russian Entente.” Carnegie Moscow Center. April 2015.

##submission.downloads##

Megjelent

2023-11-28

Hogyan kell idézni

Samay, M. A. (2023). The Strategic Path of Russia in Eurasia. Honvédségi Szemle – Hungarian Defence Review, 151(1-2), 156–159. https://doi.org/10.35926/HDR.2023.1-2.9

Folyóirat szám

Rovat

The Changing Security Environment