The Comprehensive Approach of Military Strategic Operations Planning and its support by Artificial Intelligence

Szerzők

  • Szabadföldi István
  • Négyesi Imre ezredes

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35926/HDR.2023.1-2.1

Kulcsszavak:

MDMP, M&S modelling and simulation, DIME, PMESII, ASCOPE, Wargaming, Information warfare, OPLAN

Absztrakt

Military operations are always preceded by political decisions and the transition to military means in the management of conflicts in order to pursue political goals takes place in either national or alliance context. Information operations, all-source intelligence as tools for intelligence and counter-intelligence play a key role in the planning of military operations. The last two decades have brought with them the explosive spread of digital technologies. The application of communication technology (5G), sensor systems, IoT (Internet of Things) produces a huge amount and multiple types of data, from which Big Data analytic systems and algorithms using Artificial Intelligence (AI) gain usable information. Accordingly, applications supported by AI play an increasingly important role in military operations on strategic, operational, and tactical levels. The analysis of data collection from all-source intelligence – especially SIGINT (Signal Intelligence) and OSINT (Open-Source Intelligence) and the AI-supported analysis is a key to success for Effect based Operations (EBO).

Szerző életrajzok

Szabadföldi István

student of the Doctoral School of Military Engineering at the University of Public Service in Budapest

Négyesi Imre ezredes

assistant professor of the Information Technology Department of the same institution

Hivatkozások

• AJP-5 Allied Joint Doctrine for the Planning of Operations with UK National Elements. NATO Standardization Office: 2019.

• Bosch K. and Bronkhorst, A. “Human-AI Cooperation to Benefit Military Decision Making.” NATO STO, 2018. https://www.sto.nato.int/publications/STO%20Meeting%20Proceedings/STOMPIST-160/MP-IST-160-S3-1.pdf

• Clausewitz, C. On War. (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1976)

• “Common Security and Defence Policy (CSDP) Structure, Instruments, Agencies,” Text, EEAS –

European External Action Service – European Commission. https://eeas.europa.eu/topics/commonsecurity-and-defence-policy-csdp/5392/common-security-and-defence-policy-csdp-structureinstruments-agencies_en

• COPD v3.0 – Comprehensive Operations Planning Directive. 2021. Supreme Headquarters Allied Powers Europe.

• Ehlers R. and Blannin, P. “Integrated Planning and Campaigning for Complex Problems.” The US Army War College Quarterly: Parameters 51, No. 2 (18 May 2021). https://press.armywarcollege.edu/parameters/vol51/iss2/10

• Final Report. (Arlington: National Security Commission on Artificial Intelligence, 2021) https://www.nscai.gov/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Full-Report-Digital-1.pdf Accessed on 17 January 2022.

• Gerasimov, V. “The Value of Science Is in the Foresight.” (in Russian) Voenno-Promishlenni Kurier. 27 February 2013. https://vpk-news.ru/articles/14632

• Gerasimov, V. “The Value of Science Is in the Foresight New Challenges Demand Rethinking the Forms and Methods of Carrying out Combat Operations.” MILITARY REVIEW, January-February 2016 (n.d.). https://www.armyupress.army.mil/Journals/Military-Review/English-Edition-Archives/ January-February-2016/

• JDP 2-00 Understanding And Intelligence Support To Joint Operations. 3rd edition, with change 1. (Shrivenham: 2014)

• “JP 2-01.3.” Pavilion – Dinfos Online Learning. https://pavilion.dinfos.edu/Policy-Doctrine/Article/2131656/jp-2-013/

• Lawrence, J. D. and Murdock, J. L. Political, Military, Economic, Social, Infrastructure, Information (PMESII) Effects Forecasting for Course of Action (COA) Evaluation. Ft. Belvoir: DTEC, 2090.

• “New responses to new challenges: the comprehensive crisis response and operations at SHAPE.” (in Hungarian) Honvédségi Szemle, 2017/6. http://real.mtak.hu/124824/1/HSZ_2017_145_6_Poloskei_Janos_Antal.pdf Accessed on 27 June 2022.

• Operating in the Human Domain. US SOC, 2015. https://nsiteam.com/social/wp-content/uploads/ 2017/01/SOF-OHD-Concept-V1.0-3-Aug-15.pdf

• Prelipcean, G., Boscoianu, M. and Moisescu, F. “New Ideas on the Artificial Intelligence Support in Military Applications,” Recent Advances in Artificial Intelligence, Knowledge Engineering and Data Bases. https://www.wseas.org/multimedia/books/2010/Cambridge/AIKED.pdf Accessed on 17 January 2022.

• Svenmarck, P. et al., “Possibilities and Challenges for Artificial Intelligence in Military Applications,” Researchgate, 2018. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/326774966_Possibilities_and_Challenges_for_Artificial_Intelligence_in_Military_Applications. Accessed on 17 January 2022.

• Szabadföldi, I. “Military Operation Planning (OPLAN) Supported by Artificial Intelligence.” presentation, In the Service of the Nation Conference 2021 - 2021. 70.

• TC 7-102 – Operational Environment and Army Learning. Washington DC.: HQ Dept of the Army, 2014. https://armypubs.army.mil/epubs/DR_pubs/DR_a/pdf/web/tc7_102.pdf

• Vestner, T. “From Strategy to Orders: Preparing and Conducting Military Operations with Artificial Intelligence.” GCSP, 17 February 2023. https://www.gcsp.ch/publications/military-operationsand-artificial-intelligence. Accessed on 27 February 2023.

##submission.downloads##

Megjelent

2023-11-28

Hogyan kell idézni

Szabadföldi , I., & Négyesi, I. (2023). The Comprehensive Approach of Military Strategic Operations Planning and its support by Artificial Intelligence. Honvédségi Szemle – Hungarian Defence Review, 151(1-2), 4–20. https://doi.org/10.35926/HDR.2023.1-2.1

Folyóirat szám

Rovat

Military Science in Theory and Practice